In the SILVA taxonomic framework, taxa names are adapted from widely accepted sources, and discrepancies are resolved with the overall aim of making taxonomy consistent with phylogeny. The bacterial and archaeal classification in SILVA is based on Bergey’s Taxonomic Outlines (Boone et al. 2001; Brenner et al. 2005; Vos et al. 2009; Krieg et al. 2010). Since both taxonomy and species are dynamic entities, changes are rapid and supplemental resources are required to stay up-to-date. In such cases, name changes and taxonomic outlines are adapted from the “List of Prokaryotic Names with Standing in Nomenclature” (LPSN) (Euzeby 1997). Moreover, the LPSN resource is also used to track down names without standing in nomenclature (not validly published taxa) and Candidatus taxa.
SILVA taxonomy employs a phylogeny-based process using guide trees, whereas LPSN and Bergey’s classifications are not directly phylogeny-based. Thus, topological differences between the SILVA Ref (NR 99) trees and other resources have to be expected.
In addition to this traditional taxonomic backbone, extensive effort is spent for every release to represent prominent clades known only from environmental sequences. Most of these clades and groups are annotated in the guide tree based on literature surveys and occasionally based on personal communications; therefore, not all clades are available in publications. We chose to name phylogenetically coherent groups above the family rank, consisting only of sequences from uncultured organisms, based on the clone name of the earliest submitted sequence.
With SILVA release 138 the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) has been adopted (Parks 2018). As a consequence of our efforts the following groups were prone to significant adaptations: Archaea, Enterobacterales, Deltaproteobacteria, Firmicutes, Clostridia. Betaproteobacteriales (formerly known as Betaproteobacteria) is now Burkholderiales, an order of Gammaproteobacteria. Epsilonproteobacteria vanishes within a new phylum Campilobacterota. Tenericutes are gone, they are now all part of Bacilli, inside Firmicutes.
Additionally, every sequence in the SILVA datasets carries the EMBL-EBI/ENA taxonomy assignment. Where available, the RDP and GTDB taxonomies are added for comparison. In releases <138 also the greengenes taxonomy was added.
Boone DR, Castenholz RW, Garrity GM, Staley JT (2001) The Archaea and the Deeply Branching and Phototrophic Bacteria. In. Springer, New York
Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Garrity GM, Staley JT (2005) The Proteobacteria. Springer, New York
Cole JR, Wang Q, Fish JA, Chai B, McGarrell DM, Sun Y, Brown CT, Porras-Alfaro A, Kuske CR, Tiedje JM (2014) Ribosomal Database Project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acid Res. 42:D633-D642
DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, Huber T, Dalevi D, Hu P, Andersen GL (2006) Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:5069-5072
Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Waite DW, Rinke C, Skarshewski A, Chaumeil P-A, Hugenholtz P (2018) A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat. Biotechnol. 36:996
Euzeby JP (1997) List of bacterial names with standing in nomenclature: A folder available on the Internet. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 47:590-592
Yilmaz P, Parfrey LW, Yarza P, Gerken J, Pruesse E, Quast C, Schweer T, Peplies J, Ludwig W, Glöckner FO (2014) The SILVA and "All-species Living Tree Project (LTP)" taxonomic frameworks. Nucl. Acids Res. 42:D643-D648
Glöckner FO, Yilmaz P, Quast C, Gerken J, Beccati A, Ciuprina A, Bruns G, Yarza P, Peplies J, Westram R, Ludwig W (2017) 25 years of serving the community with ribosomal RNA gene reference databases and tools. J. Biotechnol. 261:169